Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 135mm f/3.5

by Johan J Ingles-Le Nobel
Last updated August 31, 2017


This cult M42 lens by Carl Zeiss has a reputation for being the best M42 135mm lens ever made. It works extremely well as a extreme macro tube lens on APSC with an infinite objective.

a reputation for being the best M42 135mm lens ever made

The Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 lens has become a popular vintage purchase for modern DSLR owners because it is very very good. The lens is tack sharp and handles colours beautifully - the most striking aspect perhaps being these vibrant warm colours. If you choose not to use it as an extreme macro tube lens then perhaps you should give it a whirl as a regular lens and enjoy its gloriously smooth bokeh, which has bokeh enthusiasts in rapture.

Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 Specifications

Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm

Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5. As I only ever use this as a tube lens I taped over the focus mechanism so it would always sit at infinity.

The Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 lens has a simple optical design of 4 elements in 3 groups that has stood the test of time. It is thin for a 135mm, taking a 49mm filter, and is an auto aperture with an A/M switch with a nice solid metal retractable hood. The lens measures between 8.4 and 10.5 cm from the front of the camera and is instantly recognisable because of the purple coating on the front.

The minimum focus of the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 is 90cm and minimum aperture f/22. The diaphragm has 6 blades and there are various versions, one of which has a Japanese ninja 'shuriken' type aperture, characteristic for German-made Contax/Yashica lenses. The designation 'electric' refers to the electric pins on its bayonet that are used for light metering on various camera bodies of the time.

Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm Prices

The Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 lens was included in Praktica camera bundles of the 1970s as the telephoto, and there is no shortage of these around.

4 Elements

Speaking in general terms, the more optical faults you try to correct in a lens, the more lens elements you need. Old lens designs were often limited to a few lens elements because lack of sufficient coatings caused large light losses. Light is reflected (lost) for every lens element, when passing from both sides of the lens element. If the glass reflects 5% of the light, in a 4 lens element design, 66% of the light got through (compared to a multi-coated lens with say 1% reflection, 92%). Lets say they built a lens for the same purpose with 6 elements, that would lose 54%. Therefore, older lenses tend to have less elements.

It is available cheaply in second hand camera shops and on eBay, although its iconic reputation and purple front less looks does drive up prices. I picked up a pristine copy from a charity shop for UK £5, but expect to pay £100-£150 on eBay. You may also see it labelled as a Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm Sonnar, or CSJ 135.

M42 Adapter

Of course being an M42 lens does mean an extra M42 adapter in the mix, but if that is the price to pay for an outstanding tube lens then it's a small price. M42 adapters are easily found, but beware that you have the correct 42mm thread. The front filter thread is 49mm.

* Lenses

Carl Zeiss AG is a German manufacturer of optical systems, industrial measurements and medical devices, founded in Jena, an extra M42 adapter in the mix Germany in 1846 by optician Carl Zeiss. An important Zeiss innovation just before the Second World War was the technique of applying anti-reflective coating to lens surfaces.

The technique of applying multiple layers of coating was developed from this basis after the war, and known as "T*" (T-star) for the West German version and MC (Multi Coated) for the East German version. Pentax series of * lenses are perhaps a nod to this Zeiss revolution in lens coatings. The later the variant of this lens, the more and better coatings that were applied. Look especially for 4 digit fifth version of this lens - "Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Sonnar MC f3.5 135 electric", which received the same T* coatings that was later expanded to be included on all Carl Zeiss lenses.

Watch Out For...

they sometimes focus well past infinity

There are a couple of things to watch with this lens. First of all it is not rare to find Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 lenses with non-working diaphragms, this is their weak point, although disassembly is not that tricky. The aperture of many of these lenses stick because of thickening of lubricant used in the blades. The other quirk of this lens is that they do sometimes focus well past infinity.

Carl Zeiss Jena or Carl Zeiss Sonnar?!

... they're the same thing. Carl Zeiss Sonnar was a zebra finish lens (black and silver stripes), was the early version and lacks the integrated hood. The later version is all black, has an integrated hood, and sometimes marked "MC" (which stands for multicoated, the best of the various versions).

CSJ 135 f/3.5 Downloads

Comments (12)

Article: CSJ Sonnar 135
1 2 3 > [last]
Yves Gauvreau says...
This lens seems fine if not great, but I'm on a full frame Nikon and I wonder if it will cover the FF and if it will focus at infinity on my camera plus an M42 adapter and possibly some Raynox lens? Also, I already have a pretty good macro lens, a Micro 60mm AF-D, I'd be happy with just a bit more magnification, probably less 2:1 but I would also like to get further away, I assume extension tubes and or bellows (I have one Nikon) would work. Any suggestions that would work on a full frame Nikon? Thanks, lots of information on your site, maybe I mist it. YG
20th May 2018 3:14pm
Paul says...
I have seen the following said about this lens: Only works at F3.5-F4 then stuck open.Won't close F5.6-F22. If this was a virtually unused, excellent condition lens, is it probable that this would be due to the lubricant (as in the "Watch Out For" section above)? Does moving the slide over the A/M affect this? Sorry - novice here!
No. moving the slide between auto and manual won't affect this. Each lens is different and there's no way I could give you a reliable verdict without actually seeing it myself
24th July 2017 3:04pm
Tigerbright says...
Hello there. Very helpful, thank you. How does the 2.8 135 compare? It seems on ebay that they can be a little cheaper, despite the extra aperture size.
I don't know, I haven't tried it sorry :)
15th November 2016 10:48am
Tigerbright says...
Thank you nevertheless for the reply. :)
15th November 2016 6:02pm
Graham says...
I find the Pracktica lenses have a slight blue shift compared with CZJ lenses. The strange thing was when I bought mine New in 1984 it was actually cheaper than the Pracktica lens, as was the 35mm compared with the 28mm.
25th October 2017 6:34pm
1 2 3 > [last]
Page 1 of 3